Really rough notes on how I've come to view culture... both online and offline. And both.
My wife, the religious studies ph.d, sez I'm becoming a "bootstrap anthropologist".
Sigh.
These topics need to be developed fully, there's a lot more here, but wanted to get the concepts rolling, so to speak.
I have come to look at culture as a combination of:
1) development of new strategies for success in life and as a group - what works for us? What might work better?
2) information about what strategies work in life and as a group - ooooh Britney does that! That'll work for me...
3) systems for achieving status (I'm a leader, I'm a comic, I'm a bridge builder, etc.)
4) systems for collaborative accomplishment (a really powerful component of human experience, I think, see WoW or Burning Man or the Armed Services... or even, online discussions like this. We're hard wired to find a place in the group we're in and contribute to its success, and it feels gooood)
Are you talking more about "work culture" than material culture? I see culture more as the material self-expression and attempt to carry on through material form the values and beliefs of social systems, ie it is the output and atmosphere and records of a society, while your 1-4 seems to me to be more social systems per se. Perhaps our diverging interpretations is due to our different fields?
Posted by: Erik Champion | July 28, 2009 at 04:10 PM
I can certainly see the validity in both perspectives... and, just to clarify, my background is as a practitioner, having evolved this understanding primarily from what I see happening in the communities I've worked with and been a member of (primarily in an online setting). And yes, I'm using the term to refer to the whole cloth, and primarily as a process... the activity of defining and refining and taking or creating our place in a social entity, which certainly includes the meaningful expressions in that context, or even more, primarily revolves around meaningful expressions of the cultural context. I want to include the process of the evolution of the values and beliefs and their expression, or even more, I want to emphasize how dynamic that process is... The forms of culture in the last few hundred years have made it seem, at least to Western eyes, to be a static construct, and I think the online social experience is both emphasizing and expanding the underlying basis of these expressions as a dynamic activity, something we all engage in on a minute by minute basis, even if in most contexts those activities are so consistent with previous ones as to make the whole thing look immutable. But I think that's an illusion. Given the right circumstances (ie., a new and compelling cultural context), people will adopt new cultural values quite quickly, and sometimes permanently.
And that in turn indicates how strongly we consistently adhere to the cultural messages we're embracing, even if those cultural messages in turn embrace creativity and experimentation (again, enhanced in online experiences). It looks permanent, or semi-permanent, because we tend to cling to these messages so fiercely.
And I think the cap to all this is that the cultural play we're seeing online, the experimentation and cross-connection, is establishing cultural relativity, or the multiplicity and flexibility of social identity, as core concepts of our social identities. That to me is really exciting, opening up all sorts of connective flexibility that used to be a lot more difficult.
Thanks for your feedback by the way... great comments. And there are a couple of pieces of this I really want to expand upon, which hopefully will happen in the next week or so. Please let me know what you think.
Posted by: Ron Meiners | July 29, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Hello have you written more on this? In IJRP issue 1 I wrote on Oblivion as a cultural world and some psychologists and I are now tackling how virtual worlds could be compared using criteria extracted from that paper.
I would suggest that culture as material (which supports hopes dreams goals etc) and culture as system (social system) may differ and be better served by different terms.
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=714285831 | September 13, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Interesting notion, and I'll look for the paper (is it online?). I need to write more about this but have been unable to get to it of late. But the idea of separating out the two functions certainly makes sense, though I think they're also "inextricably" bound as well, mutually interacting at least in many ways. The conceptual, as it were, legitimatizes the functional, and vice versa. Thanks for the post!
PS thought: would you be up for doing a guest blog post here on the topic? An intro and link to the paper or something similar?
Posted by: Ron Meiners | September 16, 2009 at 09:25 AM
hello to the first question, see http://journalofroleplaying.org/
to the second, sure, but not for a month or so!
Looking forward to more ruminations, Erik
Posted by: erikchampion.wordpress.com | September 17, 2009 at 04:48 AM
We're hard wired to find a place in the group we're in and contribute to its success.
Posted by: cerebritis | June 29, 2010 at 10:34 PM
http://www.xn----ymcbk0bld8nta.com شات سوريا
http://www.xn----ymcbam7ans2mxa.com شات الاردن
http://www.xn----ymcbk2czfhi8a.com شات اليمن
http://www.xn----ymcjb9bb4kpa.com شات تونس
http://www.xn----ymcj1bbw2eyau3b.com شات فلسطين
http://www.xn----ymcbdi2d9f0bb.com شات ليبيا
http://www.xn----0mcg1bu2dvamg3b.com بنت فلسطين
http://www.xn----0mcg3at9ge.com بنت مصر
http://www.xn----5mcjnf5hlbg4c.com مركز تحميل
Posted by: شات سوريا | June 24, 2011 at 06:09 PM